WormholeRiders

Hello science and science fiction fans!  We went on another wild ride “Through the Wormhole” with Morgan Freeman on Wednesday night. I have had company so I am a few episodes behind, but I will catch up! The episode “The Riddle of Black Holes” was a theoretical ride into the very heart of a black hole!

In the first episode Freeman asked the question “Is there a creator”, and he gave us three very thought provoking answers.  In this week’s episode he did the same thing.  It would appear that Freeman intends to leave us each week scratching our heads and asking questions to further our understanding of the topic.

Just what is a black hole?  Freeman tells us that “astrophysicists think that black holes might form when giant stars run out of fuel and collapse under their weight.” He then goes on to say that we do not know what a black hole really is because “a black hole is a place that the accepted laws of physics breaks down.” He then makes another thought provoking statement. He states “You, me, and the world we live in may be nothing more than an illusion.”

What does he mean when he states that “the accepted laws of physics break down”?  The video above is from a show the Science Channel did on “Seeing Black Holes”.  In the video, Dr. Michio Kaku explains exactly how the laws of physics break down. I am a huge fan of Dr. Michio Kaku so you will see his name a lot in my reports.  Physicists found that when they applied Einstein’s theory of general relativity to black holes they came up with an answer that they could not accept.

The answer to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, when applied to a black hole, states that at the center of a black hole everything is infinite.  Dr. Kaku explains in the video that infinity is “nonsense”.  I believe black holes are a place where anything goes.  Everything in a black hole is infinite, so why can’t the possibilities be infinite? In this episode we meet several theoretical physicists, their theories of what a black hole is, and what they believe the effects black holes have on the space and objects that are caught in their gravitational pull.  Professor Leonard Susskind said it best when he said “The black hole is the window into a world that we don’t have the mental architecture to envision properly.”  Freeman tells us “the notion of a black hole is the natural extension of the laws of gravity.  The closer you are to a massive object, the more the pull of its gravity slows down anything trying to escape from it.”  He explains to us that if the earth were “squeezed” into mass as small as its center, then everything trying to escape would be caught in it’s gravity.  This is the same as a black hole.

Freeman introduces the first theory from Professor Christian Ott.  Professor Ott is a physicist at the California Institute of Technology. He is trying to find out if a collapsing star can produce a black hole. He compares a supernova to a marathon runner.  “There is no heat generation, no more energy generation happening at its core so gravity keeps pulling in and there’s nothing producing pressure to sustain it. Without anything to sustain it, the star collapses.”  The shockwave that it produces is a supernova.  We had one explode in 1054 that was so bright it was visible during the day, and then again about 200 years ago.  The dust and debris from these explosions are still visible to this day. Freeman tells us that there are 2 ways to see if a supernova really produces a black hole.  The first one is to witness a supernova in our own galaxy, and the other is to use a computer to see if it’s possible to produce a virtual black hole with a virtual supernova.  Professor Ott explains that it’s difficult to use a computer to “simulate a black hole” because “it brings together a lot of physics; general relativity for gravity, and fluid dynamics for the gas that collapses, and its particle phsycis.”  After years of calculations Professor Ott has a theory of how a black hole forms.  He believes they form with an unnova or as Freeman states “it’s not a bang.  It’s a whimper”.  Ott believes that some stars simply disappear without a supernova explosion. In 1931 Karl Jansky heard a background noise coming from the center of the Milky Way galaxy.  It’s that noise that Professor Reinhard Genzel believes came from a black hole. We can’t view the center of our galaxy because there is a thick dust cloud blocking our view. Due to its wavelength, infrared light can penetrate this dust.  Genzel went to the Anaconda desert of Chile in 1992 to use infrared light to look at the center of our galaxy.  Professor Genzel and his team mapped the large cluster of stars at our galactic center.  They found that the stars were moving around a very massive object that was invisible.  He then concluded that the noise that is coming from the center of our galaxy is coming from a massive black hole.  In fact, scientists predict the black hole at the center of our galaxy is a supermassive black hole because it is 4 million times the mass of our sun. “Truth is stranger than sci-fi”.  That is the next place Freeman takes us through the wormhole. Julie Comerford is an astronomer and she has been studying the center of galaxies gathering information on the black holes.  She studies the gas that falls into the black hole.  As the gas falls into the black hole it lights up under the extreme temperatures. Julie found that some black holes had 2 different peaks.  It would appear that they are waltzing.  She calls this phenomenon the “black hole waltz”.  Freeman said “black holes are paired up and dancing the cosmic night away.” Janna Levin is theoretical cosmologist that listens for black holes, and she believes you should be able to hear a pair of black holes as they dance around each other.  Imagine space time is like fabric, and  black holes warp this fabric.  It’s this warping that theoretically should cause waves that can be heard. She demonstrates a computer simulation of a pair of black holes orbiting around each other and the noise that they make.  The pattern that is formed looks a lot like the pattern that protons and electrons make as they orbit one another.  How can two black holes that are massive behave like two subatomic particles?  “This connection between the very big and the very small has already sparked a war between two of the greatest living physicists” explains Freeman. Einstein’s theory of relativity describes the very large made up of planets, stars, and galaxies.  However, it does not describe the world of the very small.  Quantum mechanics is the study of the very small. Professor Stephen Hawking believes that when virtual particles enter the event horizon of a black hole one escapes and the other falls into the black hole.  The one that escapes is emitted as radiation.  The radiation is also known as  “Hawking radiation.”  Seven years after his theory on Hawking radiation Professor Hawking stated that “for every ounce of material a black hole absorbed into it’s core it would radiate an equivalent amount of energy from it’s event horizon.”  This became known as the “information paradox.”

Leonard Susskind is a theoretical physicist that started as a plumber, and he disagrees with Hawking.  Susskind said that Hawking’s theory “violates a very very fundamental principal of physics called conservation of information.”  Hawking believed that the center of the black hole and the event horizon do not share any information.  He also believes that information that falls into the black hole is lost forever. Hawking believed that black holes simply disappear and all the information and mass inside of a black hole also disappears. Susskind emphatically does not support this theory.  This “War of black holes” waged on for 30 years.

Susskind introduced us to two astronauts Bob, Alice and the “dead and alive paradox.”  Because of Einstein’s theory of general relativity, the two astronauts have two separate views of the same event.  From Bob’s point of view, Alice will drift closer to the black hole and once she reaches the event horizon she will appear to stay there.  From Alice’s point of view she will fall through the event horizon without noticing anything different until she reaches the inside of the black hole.  Alice would then die because inside a black hole is a very hostile environment. Susskind then explains the “holographic principal”.  He applied string theory to what happens at the event horizon of a black hole.  In string theory particles are vibrating at high speeds. This time he puts Alice in an airplane that has a propeller. He said a black hole is like a high speed camera.  It can take pictures and smear them all over the even horizon.  Alice would still continue to see the hub of her airplane, but Bob would see her smeared all over the event horizon.

In both cases Alice meets a horrible death.  However, Susskind solved the information paradox by showing that information that is radiated out as Hawking radiation is smeared on the event horizon forever, and is not lost as Hawking believed.  Hawking conceded defeat at a conference in Dublin.  Freeman does not go into detail with this but I will expand on it just a little.  Hawking stated at this conference that for every universe that has a black hole there is a parallel universe without a black hole.  Therefore, information is preserved in the universe without the black hole.  This revelation of Hawking came after a lengthy hospital stay in which he almost conceded his life.  Thankfully for us and all of physics Professor Hawking won his battle. Susskind not only won the battle of the black holes, but he has forced us to change the way we look at everything in our universe.  We see objects differently now.  There’s a 3D version of us and a holographic image of everything.  How these two different puzzles fit together is a new challenge to physicists. Freeman wraps up this episode of “Through the Wormhole by saying “black holes have been a source of fascination for almost a century.  We’ve thought of them as time machines, shortcuts to parallel universes, and monsters that will one day devour the Earth.

While any of these ideas may turn out to be true one day, right here right now black holes have a profound effect on you and me.  Their shimmering holographic surfaces seem to be telling us that everything we think is here is mirrored out there at the very edge of our mysterious universe.”

Thank you all for reading. Please feel free to leave a comment here or visit me on Twitter by clicking my avatar image. Thank you.

RedOne68 (Sandra)

Hi WormholeRiders and Science Fans!

My name is Sandra or if you follow me on Twitter Redone68, and I am very pleased to announce a brand new analysis reviews series here at WHR, Science Behind the Science Fiction! My focus will be on television episodic and full length motions pictures in reviews here and on the new news sites from WHR.  We will start with Science Channels new series “Through The Wormhole” featuring narration by the outstanding actor Morgan Freeman. I hope you enjoy reading as much as I do in writing for you.

Morgan Freeman took us on an imaginative ride through the wormhole Wednesday night as he asked the ultimate question “Is there a creator”. However, the answers we got to this question are anything but simple.  He gave us three cutting edge theories from three different different sources.  Physicists who believe that God can be explained mathematically, neurologists who believe that God exists in the brain, and computer programmers who believe “God is one of them and our world is nothing more than his simulation”.  He promises that the answers we get will be “quite a trip” and “some of what we find almost defies belief”.

Freeman starts his story with an ant farm that he purchased for his daughter when she was young.  In looking at the ant colony, he compared himself observing the ant colony to God observing our world.

The first theory that Freeman talks of is the mathematical theory that simply states “nature’s grand book is written in the language of mathematics.”  There are two sets of physics; the one for the tiny atoms that is called quantum mechanics, and one for giant stars and galaxies called general relativity.  When physicists tried to combine the two theories together they did not fit.  We meet 4 scientist with theories that explain creation in a mathematical sense.  The first physicist we are introduced to is Garrett Lisi. Lisi developed a “theory of everything” that is a unified field theory that he believes unites the small and the large.  Lisi believes he has found a way for gravity to fit into everything. His “theory of everything”  is a complex theory and Freeman states that “If he is right,  then God could be one heck of a mathematician.” The video below is a short clip from “Through the Wormhole”  where Lisi explains his unified field theory.  Freeman takes us back and states “it’s possible there is already evidence for a  creator in the math.”

Lisi talks about the “Higgs Field” and the way it gives mass to everything we know.  The LHC at CERN in Geneva Switzerland is in search of the Higgs Boson particle or what is also known as the “God particle”.   The Higgs Boson is a hypothesized particle that is thought to exist in the standard model of particle physics.  In the video below Freeman explains the Higgs Boson and the LHC.

Andy Albrecht is a cosmologist and a professor of physics at UC Davis, and he explains the 4 forces of our universe.  The four forces are gravity, electromagnetism, weak force, and the strong force.  Dr. Albrecht explains each force.  Gravity is what holds everything together and keeps us on earth  electromagnetism “tells us how the chemistry works”; weak force is responsible for radioactivity, and strong force is something like the sun that is like a nuclear reactor.  Dr. Albrecht states that “all these forces have to exist just as they do for life to exist.” This is also called the “Goldilocks Paradigm”.

Rev. Dr. John Polkinghorne did research on the quark which is a subatomic particle.  He is an Anglican priest that believes in God.  He also discusses the four forces, and agrees with Dr. Albrecht that for carbon-based life to exist all four forces have to be just right.  However, he believes that God is responsible for this “fine tuning.”

Professor Alan Guth is a theoretical physicist and a cosmologist who developed the theory of inflation. Inflation theory states that the universe doubled in size 100,000 times in a fraction of a second.  It is an “accepted theory of how the universe began.”  However, there is something in this theory that is mind boggling.  It suggests that we don’t have just one universe, but that we are but one in a multiverse. Dr. Guth speaks of “eternal inflation” and how “pocket universes” emerge.  Each universe would have it’s own set of physical laws.  In the video below other theorists explain the multiverse.

The second theory that Freeman talks about is a theory that suggests God is in the right hemisphere of your brain.  He asks the question “To see God what if all you need is a magnet on the right hemisphere of your brain?”  Dr. Michael Persinger is a neuroscientist that uses his invention the “God helmet” to reproduce religious experience.  He explains that when humans “forcast their own deaths” it creates a level of anxiety.  We overcome this anxiety by developing a concept that would mean we were infinite and life would go on forever.

Dr. Persinger demonstrates how the “God helmet” works on a subject named Dominica.  She is a nursing student that lives in Ontario.  The demonstration takes one hour.  The helmet produces a magnetic field that stimulates the right side of Dominica’s brain.  He suggests that the right hemisphere “has a second sense, and when you experience it it’s called the sense “pre-sense” and we think that’s the prototype of the god experience.”  Dominica sensed 5 “p re senses” during the experiment.  She said they were “just chilling” and they were faceless.  Dr. Persinger states that it’s always in the upper visual field, and the reason for this is because the temporal lo be is being stimulated.  Dominica explains that “she didn’t feel like her head was attached to her”.  She also experienced a sense of fire coming up around her.  This was an unpleasant experience.  However, she did state that she liked the “floating” part. Dr. Persinger asks us to imagine how Dominica would have perceived this experience had she been in a church or synagogue.  He suggests that all religious experiences are created from the “hard wiring” of the brain.  He gives an example of Luther who was struck by lightning giving him visions that were attributed to God.  Dr. Persinger calls this the “God Experience.”

The third theory suggests that God is real and he is a computer programmer.  Will Wright is the creator of the Sims video games.  He creates his characters to be life like so we will be able to identify better with them.  Freeman states that we have made great advances in computer programming. He states  “it shows no sign of abating and the level of computer simulations is bound to keep pace with it.”  Will Wright said the lines of real experiences and virtual experiences are starting to blur.

Rich Terrile works at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasedena California.  He suggests

four requirements for what he thinks God ought to be; He should be an inter-dimensional being, he would be connected to everything, a creator responsible for the universe, and he should be able to change the laws of physics.  Terrile thinks that these characteristics “sound an awful lot like what programmers do when they create simulated environments.”  He suggests that in the next decade computers will be 500 times faster than the human brain.  The question is can the computers create beings like us to populate the world.

Terrile uses an example of a model brain and a laptop in a box.  He states that if “he has both in a box and starts asking them both questions but can’t distinguish which one is answering then he has to assume that if the brain is conscious and self aware then the laptop also has to be the same”.  Terrile believes that “if science shows God can exist then maybe he already does. ” Maybe we are the Sims and the creator is sitting at the controls of a super computer.”

“The rise of the machines is close at hand.”  This is what Freeman says as he talks about how computers already control much of our daily lives.  Terrile believes that we are computer generated and the way to prove this is through pixels.  Anything that is computer generated is broken down into pixels.  The physical world around us is broken down into atoms and this is what we call quantum mechanics.  Terrile states that everything is “quantized”.  Terrile takes us to Cal-tech where he conducts an experiment with electrons.  He fires electrons into a ball of graphite, and shows where each electron goes.  Each electron senses where every atom in the graphite is.  He performs this experiment to offer proof of his next statement. He states “matter does not have a finite form in the physical universe.”  He suggests that when we look at matter it looks like a form, but when we look away it loses its form.  He said our world is “pixilated.”  He also said we are “50 years away from manufacturing God.”  Terrile considers himself spiritual, and he considers this a form of religion.  Below is a picture of a computer simulation that Terrile suggests the computer creator would create.

These three theories are mind blowing to say the least  Freeman does an exceptional job at presenting the science behind these theories in a way that even the non-physicist can understand.  All of the scientist believe that we are within reach of getting an answer to the question of is there a creator?  What do you think?

I hope you enjoyed the read and feel free to leave a comment here of visit me on Twitter by clicking my image avatar to the right. Make sure to tune in this Wednesday night to the Science Channel at 10:00 pm to watch a new episode of “Through the Wormhole”!!  This weeks episode is about black holes.  Thank you.

Sandra